Ipriflavone
Also called 7-isopropoxyisoflavone, synthetic isoflavone, Ostivone, Osten.
Best grade C across 3 graded outcomes Other Last checked
The short answer
From 10 sourcesA 2020 meta-analysis of 11 trials (1,605 women) found a small lumbar-spine bone density gain, but a 474-woman trial (600 mg a day for 36 months) found none and recorded low lymphocyte counts in 13.2% of users. The evidence is conflicting and limited to postmenopausal women.
Every graded outcome on this page
3 rows · line = participantsKey facts
- What it is
- A synthetic isoflavone made from the soy isoflavone daidzein; a 1999 review describes it as having no intrinsic estrogenic activity3
- Pooled bone-density result
- Lumbar spine standardized mean difference 0.36 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.62) across 11 trials, 1,605 postmenopausal women1
- Long multicenter trial
- 474 women, 200 mg three times a day for 36 months: no difference in spine, hip or forearm bone density, bone markers or new vertebral fractures2
- Immune safety signal
- Subclinical lymphocytopenia in 31 of 234 women (13.2%) on ipriflavone; 22 of 29 who developed it during treatment had recovered by 2 years2
What it is
Ipriflavone is a synthetic isoflavone made from daidzein and sold for bone health; the largest trial found no bone-density benefit.
Forms
Form
| Form | Elemental % | Absorption (human data) | GI tolerance | Studied for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipriflavone (7-isopropoxyisoflavone) tablets or capsules | Varies3Not applicable (a synthetic compound, not a mineral) | In humans it is rapidly absorbed and quickly metabolized; about 57% of a dose is excreted in urine as metabolites and about 40% in feces, mostly as unchanged ipriflavone. In blood it is 94 to 99% bound to albumin.8 | In 60 studies (2,769 patients) adverse reactions were 14.5% vs 16.1% on placebo, mainly gastrointestinal; the 4-year trial found lymphocytopenia in 13.2%.42 | Postmenopausal bone loss |
What the human research says
Human trials only, one row per outcome. The form line shows what each trial actually tested. Grades follow our evidence-grading policy.
Trial map
3 graded outcomes, largest study first3 graded outcomes: 1 improved, 1 no effect, 1 worsened. The largest, a 2020 meta-analysis of 1,605 people on lumbar spine bone mineral density, found an improvement. One outcome found a worsening: lymphocyte count (safety) (474 people).
Bar: the ages a study enrolled (running to the edge when it states no upper or lower limit). Dot: only a mean age, counted as near your age within 5 years. Tick: the mean age inside a range.
2Lymphocyte count (safety): worsened, 45–75
3Bone density, bone markers and vertebral fractures: no effect, 45–75
1Lumbar spine bone mineral density: improved, ages not stated
1Lumbar spine bone mineral density
Improved · Grade C · Meta-analysis, 1,605 people, 2020
Postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis
Dose, result and source| Outcome | Found | People | Study | Who was studied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumbar spine bone mineral density | Improved | 1,605 | Grade C · Meta-analysis, 2020 | Postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis |
| Lymphocyte count (safety) | Worsened | 474 | Grade C · RCT, 2001 | Postmenopausal white women aged 45 to 75 with low bone density |
| Bone density, bone markers and vertebral fractures | No effect | 474 | No-effect grade · RCT, 2001 | Postmenopausal white women aged 45 to 75 with low bone density |
Every graded row
3 rowsCGrade CLumbar spine bone mineral densityBone densitySmall spine gainMeta-analysis · 11 studies
n 1,605 · 2020
Improved Lumbar spine bone density rose more with ipriflavone than placebo (standardized mean difference 0.36, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.62); bone-resorption markers fell. Withdrawals due to adverse reactions were similar to placebo; stomach and gut symptoms were the most common reactions.
- Design
- Meta-analysis, 11 studies, n = 1,605, 2020
- Population
- Postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis
- Form
- Ipriflavone (regimens varied by trial)
- Dose
- Doses not stated in the abstract
- Duration
- Varied by trial
- Source
- Reference 1 · PubMed 32407952 (opens PubMed)
CGrade CLymphocyte count (safety)Safety: lymphocytesLower lymphocyte countsRCT
n 474 · 2001
Worsened Lymphocyte concentrations fell by about 500 per microliter; 31 women (13.2%) on ipriflavone developed subclinical lymphocytopenia. Of 29 who developed it during treatment, 15 (52%) had recovered by 1 year and 22 (81%) by 2 years.
- Design
- RCT, n = 474, 2001
- Population
- Postmenopausal white women aged 45 to 75 with low bone density
- Form
- Ipriflavone tablets
- Dose
- 200 mg three times a day (600 mg a day)
- Duration
- Up to 36 months analysed
- Source
- Reference 2 · PubMed 11255425 (opens PubMed)
∅No effectBone density, bone markers and vertebral fracturesBone densityNo bone-density benefitRCT
n 474 · 2001
No effect Annual change in lumbar spine bone density did not differ from placebo (0.1% vs 0.8%, P = .14), nor did hip, forearm, bone markers or new vertebral fractures.
- Design
- RCT, n = 474, 2001
- Population
- Postmenopausal white women aged 45 to 75 with low bone density
- Form
- Ipriflavone tablets
- Dose
- 200 mg three times a day (600 mg a day), all with 500 mg calcium a day
- Duration
- 36 months analysed (4-year study)
- Source
- Reference 2 · PubMed 11255425 (opens PubMed)
What the numbers add up to
Each point is worked out from the data and the sources numbered on this page, with the arithmetic shown under it. It adds no new data and is not medical advice.
Studied doses
Doses used in research, shown against the official limits. They describe the studies, not a recommendation for you.
Studied doses in research, not advice. These are amounts used in research, not personal advice. Your clinician or pharmacist can say what fits you.
Doses studied in human trials
Interactions and safety
Published interactions only: each row cites a source. No row means none was found in our sources, not that a combination is safe.
What Ipriflavone meets
2 cited rowsMedicines 2
Supplements and foods 0
No supplement rows in our sources.
- Measured in a human study
- Case reports
Choose a medicine or supplement above to read its cited rows here.
Also cited:
Drugs cleared by the same liver enzymes
PK studyMeasured in a human study
Drugs cleared by the same liver enzymes, for example Tolbutamide; substrates of phenacetin O-deethylase (CYP1A2): In human liver microsomes ipriflavone and its 7-hydroxy metabolite competitively inhibited phenacetin O-deethylase and tolbutamide hydroxylase activity (Ki about 10 to 20 micromolar). Patients on 600 mg a day had steady-state blood levels of 0.33 and 1.44 micromolar for the two compounds. Other drugs were not tested.
Source 5, Br J Pharmacol (1998)
Theophylline
Case reportCase reports
Theophylline, for example Theophylline for asthma or COPD: Serum theophylline rose in a patient with COPD during ipriflavone use and fell after ipriflavone was stopped. In human liver microsomes, ipriflavone and its metabolites blocked theophylline's main breakdown pathway, so the interaction is plausible.
Source 7, Eur J Clin Pharmacol (1992); Source 5, Br J Pharmacol (1998); Source 6, Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet (1996)
Interactions
2 agents| Agent | What the source says | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Medicines2 | ||
| Theophyllinee.g. Theophylline for asthma or COPD | Serum theophylline rose in a patient with COPD during ipriflavone use and fell after ipriflavone was stopped. In human liver microsomes, ipriflavone and its metabolites blocked theophylline's main breakdown pathway, so the interaction is plausible.756 | Case report |
| Drugs cleared by the same liver enzymese.g. Tolbutamide; substrates of phenacetin O-deethylase (CYP1A2) | In human liver microsomes ipriflavone and its 7-hydroxy metabolite competitively inhibited phenacetin O-deethylase and tolbutamide hydroxylase activity (Ki about 10 to 20 micromolar). Patients on 600 mg a day had steady-state blood levels of 0.33 and 1.44 micromolar for the two compounds. Other drugs were not tested.5 | PK study |
Check with what you take
Kept on this device onlyAdd what you take. We list every interaction our evidence profiles cite between Ipriflavone and your picks, and between your picks.
- Loading names…
Add a supplement or medicine you take to check it against Ipriflavone.
Starting from one medicine? The interaction checker rates how serious each pair is, on a curated list of 19 entries for 11 medicines. This cabinet has no severity rating: it lists every interaction row our supplement pages cite.
Who should be careful
4 groups- Low lymphocyte counts or immune suppression
- Ipriflavone lowered lymphocyte counts in the 474-woman trial. No study tested it with immune-suppressing medicines or in people with existing low counts; avoiding that combination is an inference from the lymphocyte finding.2
- Kidney disease
- In patients with renal failure, steady-state blood levels of ipriflavone and its metabolites were higher than in healthy volunteers, and renal elimination fell as kidney disease worsened.9
How to read the label
What to check on the Supplement Facts panel.
How to read the label
2 checksLabel dose vs studied dose
Regulatory status
The 2020 meta-analysis authors describe ipriflavone as an over-the-counter drug for osteoporosis in more than 22 countries since 1989. None of the sources cited here reports an FDA approval; the FDA does not approve dietary supplements for safety or effectiveness before sale, and a product marketed with disease claims is regulated as a drug.110
Frequently asked questions
Short answers to common questions; the numbers link to the sources below.
Common questions
5 answersDoes ipriflavone build bone?
Does ipriflavone lower fracture risk?
In the 474-woman trial the number of women with new vertebral fractures was identical or nearly so in both groups at every time point.2
Is ipriflavone safe?
Does ipriflavone interact with medicines?
Sources
10 sources: trial abstracts, NIH fact sheets and reference databases. Numbers in the text link here.
Sources cited on this page
10 sources- 1The efficacy and safety of ipriflavone in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Meta-analysis Pharmacol Res, 2020 · PMID 32407952
- 2Ipriflavone in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.RCT JAMA, 2001 · PMID 11255425
- 3Ipriflavone: an important bone-building isoflavone.Review Altern Med Rev, 1999 · PMID 9988779
- 4Efficacy of ipriflavone in established osteoporosis and long-term safety.Review Calcif Tissue Int, 1997 · PMID 9263613
- 5Ipriflavone as an inhibitor of human cytochrome P450 enzymes.PK study Br J Pharmacol, 1998 · PMID 9517377
- 6The effect of ipriflavone and its main metabolites on theophylline biotransformation.PK study Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet, 1996 · PMID 8839679
- 7Elevation of serum theophylline levels by ipriflavone in a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Observational Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 1992 · PMID 1425881
- 8[Pharmacokinetics of ipriflavone].Review Acta Pharm Hung, 1995 · PMID 8742629
- 9Steady-state pharmacokinetics of ipriflavone and its metabolites in patients with renal failure.PK study Int J Clin Pharmacol Res, 1991 · PMID 1813437
- 10FDA 101: Dietary SupplementsFact sheet U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2022 · fda.gov
What changed
Every dated change to this page: what changed, who made it and why.
Change log
2 entries| Date | Change | Who and why |
|---|---|---|
| evidence | Adversarial review: rows, key facts, interactions and safety notes re-read against the abstracts (numbers match). The "no intrinsic estrogenic activity" key fact is now attributed to the 1999 review it comes from rather than stated as established. | Writer: Kymata Health EditorialTrigger: adversarial review |
| all | Initial editorial evidence review. Every PMID checked against NCBI E-utilities esummary (title, year, journal) and each cited abstract read; numbers taken from the abstracts only. The 2001 JAMA RCT and 2020 meta-analysis are shown side by side because they disagree. Funding is not stated in the abstracts. | Writer: Kymata Health EditorialTrigger: new page |
Supplement & Nutrient Encyclopedia. Educational information only; it is not medical advice and does not replace a clinician. Dietary supplements are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Statements about supplements have not been evaluated by the FDA.