Eucommia bark (Du Zhong)
Also called Eucommia ulmoides, Eucommia ulmoides bark, Du Zhong, Duzhong, Eucommiae cortex, hardy rubber tree.
Best grade C across 4 graded outcomes Botanical Last checked
The short answer
From 4 sourcesEucommia bark (Du Zhong) is a traditional Chinese herb studied mainly for blood pressure. Small trials report drops of roughly 7-8 mmHg systolic in mildly raised blood pressure, but results are mixed: an 8-week US trial and a 12-week add-on trial in China missed their main targets. Both Chinese trials were co-authored by employees of the capsule maker.
Every graded outcome on this page
4 rows · line = participants- CGrade CBlood-pressure rhythm when added to usual medicinesBlood pressuren 136
- CGrade COffice and 24-hour blood pressure in grade 1 hypertensionBlood pressuren 58
- DGrade DBlood pressure in mildly raised blood pressure (2 weeks)Blood pressuren 30
- DGrade DBlood pressure in mildly raised blood pressure (8 weeks, lower dose)Blood pressuren 24
Key facts
- Blood pressure
- In a US trial of 30 adults with blood pressure of 120-160/80-100 mmHg, 3 g/day of a standardized bark extract for 2 weeks lowered blood pressure by an average of 7.5/3.9 mmHg1
- Null result at lower dose
- The same paper found no blood-pressure difference between groups with 1.5 g/day for 8 weeks in 24 adults1
- Chinese capsule trial
- In 58 people with grade 1 hypertension, office blood pressure fell 7.6/4.7 mmHg over 4 weeks with Quanduzhong capsules; most other measures, including most 24-hour readings, did not differ from sham capsules2
- Add-on to medicines
- Added to usual blood-pressure medicines for 12 weeks in 136 people, the capsules did not improve blood-pressure variability, the main outcome3
What it is
Eucommia bark is the dried bark of the Chinese tree Eucommia ulmoides (Du Zhong), used in Chinese medicine and sold as an extract.
How it works
ProposedIn the US trial report, the extract reduced stimulated fat breakdown in a human fat-cell assay, which the authors read as beta-adrenergic blocking activity, and earlier rat work linked it to increased nitric oxide. Both are proposed explanations, not confirmed in people.1
Forms, side by side
2 forms named in our sources. The rest show what our data holds, and say plainly where it holds nothing yet.
Eucommia bark (Du Zhong) forms compared
2 forms| 2 forms | Aqueous bark extract standardized to pinoresinol diglucoside | Quanduzhong capsules (whole Eucommia bark extract, China) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorption in people | No human absorption data.1 | Not measured.2 |
| GI tolerance | No toxicity at 1.5 g/day for 8 weeks; well tolerated at 3 g/day for 2 weeks.1 | Mild adverse events, no difference from sham in safety measures over 4 weeks.2 |
| Studied for | Blood pressure | Blood pressure, blood-pressure rhythm |
- Aqueous bark extract standardized to pinoresinol diglucoside
- Quanduzhong capsules (whole Eucommia bark extract, China)
What the human research says
Human trials only, one row per outcome. The form line shows what each trial actually tested. Grades follow our evidence-grading policy.
Trial map
4 graded outcomes, largest study first4 graded outcomes: 2 improved, 2 no effect. The largest, a 2025 randomized trial of 136 people on Blood-pressure rhythm when added to usual medicines, found no effect.
1Blood-pressure rhythm when added to usual medicines
No effect · Grade C · RCT, 136 people, 2025
Chinese adults with essential hypertension and an abnormal day-night blood-pressure rhythm, on their usual medicines
Dose, result and source| Outcome | Found | People | Study | Who was studied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood-pressure rhythm when added to usual medicines | No effect | 136 | Grade C · RCT, 2025 | Chinese adults with essential hypertension and an abnormal day-night blood-pressure rhythm, on their usual medicines |
| Office and 24-hour blood pressure in grade 1 hypertension | Improved | 58 | Grade C · RCT, 2022 | Chinese adults with low-to-moderate-risk grade 1 hypertension (3 centres) |
| Blood pressure in mildly raised blood pressure (2 weeks) | Improved | 30 | Grade D · RCT, 2011 | Healthy US adults with blood pressure 120-160/80-100 mmHg |
| Blood pressure in mildly raised blood pressure (8 weeks, lower dose) | No effect | 24 | Grade D · RCT, 2011 | Healthy US adults with blood pressure 120-160/80-100 mmHg |
Every graded row
4 rowsShowing 4 of 4 outcomes. Human trials only.
CGrade CBlood-pressure rhythm when added to usual medicinesBlood pressureMain outcome not metRCT
n 136 · 2025
No effect No significant difference in blood-pressure variability (SD and CV) in the full or per-protocol analysis. In the subgroup not using calcium channel blockers, 24-hour diastolic variability improved more.
- Design
- RCT, n = 136, 2025
- Population
- Chinese adults with essential hypertension and an abnormal day-night blood-pressure rhythm, on their usual medicines
- Form
- Quanduzhong capsules added to usual medicines vs usual medicines alone
- Dose
- 1.48 g twice daily
- Duration
- 12 weeks
- Source
- Reference 3 · PubMed 41132538 (opens PubMed)
CGrade COffice and 24-hour blood pressure in grade 1 hypertensionBlood pressure-7.6 / -4.7 mmHg officeRCT
n 58 · 2022
Improved Office systolic and diastolic pressure changed by -7.62 and -4.66 mmHg (p < .05) and diastolic variability improved versus control; no differences in other measures, including most 24-hour readings. Adverse events were mild.
- Design
- RCT, n = 58, 2022
- Population
- Chinese adults with low-to-moderate-risk grade 1 hypertension (3 centres)
- Form
- Quanduzhong capsules (Eucommia bark extract) vs sham capsules
- Dose
- Not stated in the abstract
- Duration
- 4 weeks (after a 1-week sham lead-in)
- Source
- Reference 2 · PubMed 36703729 (opens PubMed)
DGrade DBlood pressure in mildly raised blood pressure (2 weeks)Blood pressure-7.5 / -3.9 mmHgRCT
n 30 · 2011
Improved 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure fell by an average of 7.5/3.9 mmHg and the extract was well tolerated.
- Design
- RCT, n = 30, 2011
- Population
- Healthy US adults with blood pressure 120-160/80-100 mmHg
- Form
- Aqueous bark extract standardized to 8% pinoresinol di-beta-D-glucoside
- Dose
- 1 g three times daily (3 g/day)
- Duration
- 2 weeks
- Source
- Reference 1 · PubMed 22214253 (opens PubMed)
DGrade DBlood pressure in mildly raised blood pressure (8 weeks, lower dose)Blood pressureNo differenceRCT
n 24 · 2011
No effect No difference in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure between the two groups and no toxicity.
- Design
- RCT, n = 24, 2011
- Population
- Healthy US adults with blood pressure 120-160/80-100 mmHg
- Form
- Aqueous bark extract standardized to 8% pinoresinol di-beta-D-glucoside
- Dose
- 500 mg three times daily (1.5 g/day)
- Duration
- 8 weeks
- Source
- Reference 1 · PubMed 22214253 (opens PubMed)
Eucommia leaf: a different preparation
1 noteHuman data on the leaf that cannot be graded for the bark.
- Uncontrolled leaf-tablet study
- In a 2025 single-arm Japanese study, 17 adults (9 with mild chronic kidney disease) took a Tochu (Eucommia) leaf-extract tablet for a median of 33 days; systolic blood pressure fell from 128.3 to 123.8 mmHg, mainly in those with kidney disease. Without a control group, this cannot show an effect, and it tested leaf, not bark.4
What the numbers add up to
Each point is worked out from the data and the sources numbered on this page, with the arithmetic shown under it. It adds no new data and is not medical advice.
Studied doses
Doses used in research, shown against the official limits. They describe the studies, not a recommendation for you.
Studied doses in research, not advice. These are amounts used in research, not personal advice. Your clinician or pharmacist can say what fits you.
Doses studied in human trials
When trials measured an effect
2 outcomesInteractions and safety
Published interactions only: each row cites a source. No row means none was found in our sources, not that a combination is safe.
Interactions
0 agentsNone found in our sources.
Check with what you take
Kept on this device onlyAdd what you take. We list every interaction our evidence profiles cite between Eucommia bark and your picks, and between your picks.
- Loading names…
Add a supplement or medicine you take to check it against Eucommia bark.
Starting from one medicine? The interaction checker rates how serious each pair is, on a curated list of 19 entries for 11 medicines. This cabinet has no severity rating: it lists every interaction row our supplement pages cite.
Who should be careful
4 groups- People on blood-pressure medicines
- Eucommia lowered blood pressure in some trials and showed beta-blocker-like activity in a lab assay. Its use with medicines has been tested in one 12-week trial whose abstract gives no safety detail, so the combined effect is not well characterised.13
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding
- No reliable data. Chinese medicine has traditionally used Du Zhong to 'soothe miscarriages', but no trial has tested its safety in pregnancy or breastfeeding, the cited trials enrolled non-pregnant adults, and LactMed has no entry for Eucommia.2
- Low blood pressure
- Because the trials aimed to lower blood pressure, people whose blood pressure already runs low have no data supporting use.12
- Liver and kidney disease
- Over 4 weeks, the 58-person Quanduzhong trial found no severe liver or kidney function problems and no difference from sham capsules in safety tests. LiverTox has no Eucommia entry, and people with existing liver or kidney disease have not been studied in controlled trials.2
How to read the label
What to check on the Supplement Facts panel.
How to read the label
2 checksFrequently asked questions
Short answers to common questions; the numbers link to the sources below.
Common questions
5 answersDoes Eucommia lower blood pressure?
Is Eucommia bark safe?
Can it be combined with blood-pressure medicines?
Only one trial added it to usual medicines, and its abstract gives no safety detail. Because both lower blood pressure, the combination is not well characterised.3
Is Eucommia leaf tea the same as the bark?
Sources
4 sources: trial abstracts, NIH fact sheets and reference databases. Numbers in the text link here.
Sources cited on this page
4 sources- 1A clinical trial testing the safety and efficacy of a standardized Eucommia ulmoides Oliver bark extract to treat hypertension.RCT Altern Med Rev, 2011 · PMID 22214253
- 2Quanduzhong capsules for the treatment of grade 1 hypertension patients with low-to-moderate risk: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.RCT Front Pharmacol, 2022 · PMID 36703729
- 3Efficacy of Quanduzhong capsules in regulating blood pressure circadian rhythm in essential hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, add-on controlled clinical trial.RCT Front Pharmacol, 2025 · PMID 41132538
- 4An Exploratory Single-Arm Clinical Trial on Eucommia Ulmoides Leaf Extract Effects on Blood Pressure, Oxidative Stress, and Atrial Natriuretic Peptide (ANP) in Individuals With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease.Open-label trial Int J Nephrol, 2025 · PMID 40575587
What changed
Every dated change to this page: what changed, who made it and why.
Change log
2 entries| Date | Change | Who and why |
|---|---|---|
| who should avoid, time to effect, research notes, FAQ, questions, related | Searched PubMed for 2023–2026 Eucommia trials and reviews: no new controlled bark trial or meta-analysis beyond the 2025 Quanduzhong add-on trial already in the table. Added a pregnancy note that records no data (no LactMed entry) and the traditional use in pregnancy stated in the 2022 trial, a liver and kidney note from that trial's safety tests (no LiverTox entry), time-to-effect rows, a 2025 uncontrolled leaf-extract study as an ungraded research note, an FAQ on leaf versus bark, page questions and goal-hub and methodology links. Interactions checked: no documented drug interactions in PubMed, LactMed or LiverTox, so the list stays empty; the blood-pressure-medicine caution remains under who should be careful. | Writer: Kymata Health EditorialTrigger: A–Z audit against docs/supplements/AUDIT-STANDARD.md |
| all | Initial editorial evidence review (first draft). Every PMID checked against NCBI E-utilities esummary (titles and years taken from the record, none retracted) and the abstract read for each cited row. Studied doses are reported as research doses, not dosing advice. | Writer: Kymata Health EditorialTrigger: new page |
Supplement & Nutrient Encyclopedia. Educational information only; it is not medical advice and does not replace a clinician. Dietary supplements are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Statements about supplements have not been evaluated by the FDA.