Xylitol and tooth decay

What 8 graded rows on xylitol agree on for tooth decay, and where they differ. Counted side by side, never averaged.

What the rows agree on

Each block and row is one graded row from the Xylitol page, with its PubMed record.

Your question

Xylitol and tooth decay

8 rows · 14,579 people

Split. 4 rows found an improvement and 4 found no difference.

Each block is one evidence row, sized by how many people it enrolled, with its grade inside.
  • Grade C× 4
  • Grade D× 3
  • No effect× 1
Rows
8
Trials
31
People
14,579
Pooled reviews may count some twice

Where they differ

From the rows
Trial sizeStudy designWho was studied

The best-graded row, grade C, is a meta-analysis of 6,325 people (2024) and found an improvement. 1 row is graded No effect, our grade for adequately powered trials that found no effect.

The 4 rows that found an improvement were larger: a median of 3,322 people, against a median of 327 people for the 4 rows that found no difference.

Only the 4 rows that found an improvement include pooled reviews of several trials (2 of 4); the 4 rows that found no difference are single studies.

Only the 4 rows that found an improvement name women in their population.

The rows

4 improved · 4 no difference
  1. Grade CTooth decay in permanent teeth of children and teens (pooled) · Improved

    Meta-analysis, 15 studies · n 6,325 · 2024 · Children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 in 11 randomized and 4 controlled trials

    As given in each included study · Varied by study

    Xylitol reduced caries compared with no treatment or placebo (SMD −0.50, 95% CI −0.85 to −0.16); sorbitol had a smaller effect (SMD −0.10). Twelve of 15 studies were at moderate or high risk of bias.

    Row on the Xylitol page · PubMed 38762077 (opens PubMed)

  2. Grade CTooth decay in children and adults (pooled) · Improved

    Meta-analysis, 10 studies · n 5,903 · 2015 · Children and adults in 10 randomized trials (7 at high risk of bias)

    Varied; 10% xylitol fluoride toothpaste in the main finding · Up to 2.5 to 3 years

    Fluoride toothpaste with 10% xylitol may reduce cavities by 13% versus fluoride-only toothpaste (4,216 children, low-quality evidence). Evidence for lozenges, tablets, wipes and syrup was too uncertain to show a benefit; one infant study found 8 g/day syrup reduced caries by 58% versus 2.67 g/day.

    Row on the Xylitol page · PubMed 25809586 (opens PubMed)

  3. Grade CNew cavities in schoolchildren (candies and gum) · Improved

    RCT · n 740 · 2000 · 10-year-old children in 12 Estonian schools, in three clusters

    5 g/day on school days · 2 or 3 years

    After 3 years, all xylitol groups had 35% to 60% fewer new cavities than their control groups, with no consistent difference between candies and gum.

    Row on the Xylitol page · PubMed 10830649 (opens PubMed)

  4. Grade DPassing cavity-causing bacteria from mother to child · Improved

    RCT · n 107 · 2010 · Pregnant women with high salivary mutans streptococci in Japan, and their children to age 24 months

    Maternal gum from the sixth month of pregnancy · 13 months of chewing; children followed to 24 months

    Children of mothers who chewed xylitol gum were less likely to be colonized by mutans streptococci between 9 and 24 months and acquired them 8.8 months later than children in the control group.

    Row on the Xylitol page · PubMed 19948944 (opens PubMed)

  5. Grade CTooth decay in schoolchildren: xylitol vs sorbitol candy · No difference

    RCT · n 485 · 2014 · First- and second-grade children in southeastern Estonia

    About 7.5 g/day of polyol on school days · 3 years

    Children on xylitol candy did not have fewer dentin cavities than the sorbitol control group; the erythritol group had fewer dentin cavities and a longer time before lesions developed than both.

    Row on the Xylitol page · PubMed 24852946 (opens PubMed)

  6. Grade DEarly childhood cavities with xylitol fluoride toothpaste · No difference

    RCT · n 168 · 2014 · Four- to five-year-olds in four Head Start classrooms in the Marshall Islands (cluster-randomized)

    Supervised toothbrushing · 6 months

    The mean increase in decayed surfaces was 2.5 with xylitol toothpaste and 1.4 with the sorbitol toothpaste; the difference was not significant (P = 0.07). No adverse effects were reported.

    Row on the Xylitol page · PubMed 24709430 (opens PubMed)

  7. Grade DCavities between teeth in high-risk adolescents (lozenges) · No difference

    RCT · n 160 · 2008 · Children aged 10 to 12 at high caries risk, with a non-randomized no-tablet reference group of 70

    2.5 g/day xylitol in six lozenges · 2 years

    No significant difference in new cavities between groups or versus the no-tablet group. Only 41% followed the schedule well and 28% dropped out.

    Row on the Xylitol page · PubMed 18341562 (opens PubMed)

  8. No effectNew cavities in adults at high caries risk · No difference

    RCT · n 691 · 2013 · Adults aged 21 to 80 at elevated caries risk at three sites (X-ACT)

    Five 1.0 g lozenges a day (5 g/day) · 33 months

    Xylitol reduced the caries increment by 10%, less than one-third of a tooth surface a year, which was not statistically significant. There was no dose-response effect.

    Row on the Xylitol page · PubMed 23283923 (opens PubMed)

Educational only. Not medical advice. Some links earn us a commission: kymatahealth.com/affiliate-disclosure.