Creatine monohydrate and performance

What 5 graded rows on creatine monohydrate agree on for performance, and where they differ. Counted side by side, never averaged.

What the rows agree on

Each block and row is one graded row from the Creatine monohydrate page, with its PubMed record.

Your question

Supplement
Creatine monohydrate Choose another

Creatine monohydrate and performance

5 rows · 3,718 people

They agree: all 5 rows found an improvement.

No difference
Each block is one evidence row, sized by how many people it enrolled, with its grade inside.
  • Grade A× 3
  • Grade D× 2
Rows
5
Trials
5
At least: a review without a trial count
People
3,718
Pooled reviews may count some twice

What the rows share

From the rows

The best-graded row, grade A, is a meta-analysis of 1,937 people (2025) and found an improvement.

The rows run from 40 to 1,937 people, published from 2022 to 2026: 3 pooled reviews and 2 single studies.

The rows

5 improved
  1. Grade AMuscular power and strength across lifts · Improved

    Meta-analysis · n 1,937 · 2025 · 69 RCTs in adults, with various exercise programs or none

    Varied across trials · Varied across trials

    With resistance training: bench/chest press +1.43 kg, squat +5.64 kg, vertical jump +1.48 cm, Wingate peak power +47.8 W vs placebo. No significant effect on handgrip or leg press. Benefits were clearer in younger adults and men.

    Row on the Creatine monohydrate page · PubMed 40944139 (opens PubMed)

  2. Grade ALean body mass · Improved

    Meta-analysis · n 1,192 · 2022 · 35 RCTs in adults without specific diseases, with or without exercise programs

    Varied across trials · Varied across trials

    Overall +0.68 kg lean mass vs placebo; +1.10 kg when combined with resistance training (any age). No significant effect without exercise (+0.03 kg) or with mixed exercise. Men +1.46 kg; women +0.29 kg (not significant).

    Row on the Creatine monohydrate page · PubMed 35986981 (opens PubMed)

  3. Grade AMuscle strength with resistance training · Improved

    Meta-analysis · n 509 · 2024 · Adults under 50 doing resistance training; 23 RCTs, mostly men (447 men, 40 women, 22 mixed)

    Varied across trials; a non-significant trend toward larger lower-body gains at higher doses · Varied across trials

    Versus placebo, upper-body strength +4.43 kg and lower-body strength +11.35 kg. Gains were significant in men; women showed no significant gains, but only 2 trials (40 women) were female-only.

    Row on the Creatine monohydrate page · PubMed 39519498 (opens PubMed)

  4. Grade DSprint and jump performance with creatine HCl · Improved

    RCT · n 40 · 2026 · Male collegiate soccer players doing 4 weeks of repeated-sprint training; 4 groups of 10

    Not stated in abstract · 4 weeks

    All creatine groups improved physical performance, peak power and fatigue index more than placebo. HCl and ethyl ester groups gained more than monohydrate on jump, 20-m sprint, L-run agility and peak power; no differences in mean power or VO2max.

    Row on the Creatine monohydrate page · PubMed 42720250 (opens PubMed)

  5. Grade DStrength and muscle size with creatine HCl · Improved

    RCT · n 40 · 2024 · Adults aged 18–25 doing 8 weeks of resistance training; 4 groups of 10

    HCl 0.03 g/kg/day; monohydrate 0.03 g/kg/day with or without a 5-day 0.3 g/kg/day loading phase · 8 weeks

    Both HCl and monohydrate increased strength, muscle cross-sectional area and skeletal muscle mass more than placebo. Creatine HCl showed no benefit over monohydrate.

    Row on the Creatine monohydrate page · PubMed 39545789 (opens PubMed)

Educational only. Not medical advice. Some links earn us a commission: kymatahealth.com/affiliate-disclosure.