Rhapontic Rhubarb Extract (ERr 731)

Also called ERr 731, rhapontic rhubarb, Rheum rhaponticum, Siberian rhubarb, rhubarb root extract, Estrovera.

The short answer

From 11 sources

ERr 731, a rhapontic rhubarb root extract in a 4 mg tablet, cut menopause symptom scores and hot flushes vs placebo in two 12-week trials of about 110 perimenopausal women each. A 2025 German records study found no rise in breast cancer diagnoses. Most of the research comes from one group of authors.

Key facts

What it is
A special extract of Rheum rhaponticum root, sold as Phytoestrol N in Germany and, in North America, under the name Estrovera8
Dose in trials
One enteric-coated 4 mg tablet a day6
Menopause score (112 women)
MRS fell from 27.0 to 12.4 vs 27.0 to 24.0 on placebo after 12 weeks3
Pooled (4 studies, 390 women)
Menopause Rating Scale 15.12 points lower than control4
Breast cancer (records study)
No higher diagnosis rate in 5,686 users vs 17,058 non-users (OR 1.01)7

What it is

ERr 731 is a standardized extract of rhapontic rhubarb root (Rheum rhaponticum), sold for menopausal symptoms as a 4 mg tablet.

How it works

Proposed

In cell studies, ERr 731 and its aglycones activated estrogen receptor-beta but not estrogen receptor-alpha, and showed no anti-estrogen effect. Researchers propose that ER-beta activity explains the effect on menopausal symptoms; this has not been shown in people.9

Forms

Form

The form on this page
FormStandardized toAbsorption (human data)GI toleranceStudied for
ERr 731 enteric-coated tablet (Phytoestrol N, Estrovera)4 mg of standardized root extract6No human absorption data in the cited abstracts.1Better tolerated than placebo in the 2006 trial; in German post-marketing data, 124 adverse event reports over about 140 million daily doses, mostly hypersensitivity and stomach upset.18Menopause symptoms, hot flushes, anxiety in perimenopause

What the human research says

Human trials only, one row per outcome. The form line shows what each trial actually tested. Grades follow our evidence-grading policy.

Trial map

7 graded outcomes, largest study first

7 graded outcomes: 6 improved, 1 no effect. The largest, a 2025 observational study of 22,744 people on breast cancer diagnosis in prescription users, found no effect.

1Breast cancer diagnosis in prescription users

No effect · Grade D · Observational, 22,744 people, 2025

Women seen by 260 office-based gynecologists in Germany, 1993 to 2022

Dose, result and source
Every graded outcome on this page, largest study first
OutcomeFoundPeopleStudyWho was studied
Breast cancer diagnosis in prescription usersNo effect22,744Grade D · Observational, 2025Women seen by 260 office-based gynecologists in Germany, 1993 to 2022
Menopause Rating Scale (pooled)Improved390Grade B · Meta-analysis, 2024Perimenopausal women in 4 studies (193 ERr 731, 197 control)
Menopause symptom score (confirmatory trial)Improved112Grade B · RCT, 2009Perimenopausal women with menopausal symptoms
Menopause symptom score and hot flushesImproved109Grade B · RCT, 2006Perimenopausal women with climacteric complaints
Anxiety in perimenopauseImproved109Grade C · RCT, 2007Perimenopausal women with climacteric complaints and anxiety
Headache/migraine, dizziness and other complaints over 52 weeksImproved89Grade D · Open-label trial, 2026Perimenopausal women aged 45–55 who continued from a 12-week RCT (112 women) into a 52-week open study
Symptom scores over up to 96 weeksImproved80Grade D · Open-label trial, 2009Women from the 2006 RCT continuing in open follow-up
Each circle is one graded outcome on this page, numbered from the largest study down, and placed by how many people it studied (log scale). It shows who was studied and what was found, not advice about your dose.

Every graded row

7 rows

Showing 7 of 7 outcomes. Human trials only.

Grade BMenopause Rating Scale (pooled)Menopause symptomsLower symptom scoresMeta-analysis · 4 studies
n 390 · 2024

Improved MRS was 15.12 points lower with ERr 731 than control (p < 0.001); heterogeneity was high.

Design
Meta-analysis, 4 studies, n = 390, 2024
Population
Perimenopausal women in 4 studies (193 ERr 731, 197 control)
Form
ERr 731
Dose
Varied by study
Duration
Varied by study
Source
Reference 4 · PubMed 38646867 (opens PubMed)
Grade BMenopause symptom score (confirmatory trial)Menopause symptomsLower symptom scoresRCT
n 112 · 2009

Improved MRS total fell from 27.0 to 12.4 points vs 27.0 to 24.0 on placebo (p < 0.0001), with fewer hot flushes; 11 adverse events in 5 women on ERr 731 vs 3 in 3 on placebo.

Design
RCT, n = 112, 2009
Population
Perimenopausal women with menopausal symptoms
Form
ERr 731 enteric-coated tablet
Dose
One tablet a day
Duration
12 weeks
Source
Reference 3 · PubMed 19161045 (opens PubMed)
Grade BMenopause symptom score and hot flushesMenopause symptomsLower symptom scoresRCT
n 109 · 2006

Improved The MRS II total score and each symptom fell more than with placebo (p < 0.0001), hot flush number and severity fell from week 4, and endometrial biopsies, bleeding and safety labs did not differ.

Design
RCT, n = 109, 2006
Population
Perimenopausal women with climacteric complaints
Form
ERr 731 enteric-coated tablet
Dose
One tablet a day
Duration
12 weeks
Source
Reference 1 · PubMed 16894335 (opens PubMed)
Grade CAnxiety in perimenopauseAnxietyLower anxietyRCT
n 109 · 2007

Improved Hamilton Anxiety score fell from 27.5 to 9.4 vs 25.1 to 21.6 on placebo; 33 of 39 completers on ERr 731 went from moderate or severe to slight anxiety.

Design
RCT, n = 109, 2007
Population
Perimenopausal women with climacteric complaints and anxiety
Form
ERr 731 enteric-coated tablet
Dose
One tablet a day
Duration
12 weeks
Source
Reference 2 · PubMed 17213754 (opens PubMed)
Grade DBreast cancer diagnosis in prescription usersBreast safetyNo increase seenObservational
n 22,744 · 2025

No effect Breast cancer diagnosis was not more likely with ERr 731 than without (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.26) or vs hormone therapy (OR 0.96).

Design
Observational, n = 22,744, 2025
Population
Women seen by 260 office-based gynecologists in Germany, 1993 to 2022
Form
ERr 731 prescription vs none (and vs hormone therapy)
Dose
Prescribed doses
Duration
Records follow-up
Source
Reference 7 · PubMed 40358648 (opens PubMed)
Grade DHeadache/migraine, dizziness and other complaints over 52 weeksHeadacheLower headache scoresOpen-label trial
n 89 · 2026

Improved Symptom severity fell in all measured domains from baseline to week 52, with notable improvements in headache/migraine and paresthesia. Because everyone took ERr 731 in the open phase, former ERr 731 and placebo groups no longer differed, except for dizziness (p = 0.0086); over 90% reported good or very good spirits at week 52.

Design
Open-label trial, n = 89, 2026
Population
Perimenopausal women aged 45–55 who continued from a 12-week RCT (112 women) into a 52-week open study
Form
ERr 731 tablet
Dose
4 mg/day
Duration
12-week RCT, then 52 weeks open-label
Source
Reference 6 · PubMed 42416823 (opens PubMed)
Grade DSymptom scores over up to 96 weeksLong-term useSustained lower scoresOpen-label trial
n 80 · 2009

Improved Symptoms kept falling; women switched from placebo reached similar scores after 18 weeks, and by the end they averaged under 1.4 slight hot flushes a day with no related adverse events.

Design
Open-label trial, n = 80, 2009
Population
Women from the 2006 RCT continuing in open follow-up
Form
ERr 731 enteric-coated tablet
Dose
One tablet a day
Duration
48 weeks (51 women continued to 96 weeks)
Source
Reference 5 · PubMed 18978638 (opens PubMed)

What the numbers add up to

Each point is worked out from the data and the sources numbered on this page, with the arithmetic shown under it. It adds no new data and is not medical advice.

One research group

The randomized trials, long-term follow-up and records study share authors; the 2025 and 2026 papers disclose ownership of or employment at Health Research Services GmbH.13567

How we got this: Author lists and conflict statements in the cited abstracts

Studied doses

Doses used in research, shown against the official limits. They describe the studies, not a recommendation for you.

Studied doses in research, not advice. These are amounts used in research, not personal advice. Your clinician or pharmacist can say what fits you.

Doses studied in human trials

Doses studied in human trials ranged from one 4 mg ERr 731 tablet a day for 12 weeks in controlled trials to the same tablet for up to 96 weeks in open follow-up; no other rhubarb product was tested.6135

Interactions and safety

Published interactions only: each row cites a source. No row means none was found in our sources, not that a combination is safe.

Interactions

0 agents

None found in our sources.

Check with what you take

Kept on this device only

Add what you take. We list every interaction our evidence profiles cite between Rhapontic Rhubarb Extract and your picks, and between your picks.

Most cited:

Add a supplement or medicine you take to check it against Rhapontic Rhubarb Extract.

Starting from one medicine? The interaction checker rates how serious each pair is, on a curated list of 19 entries for 11 medicines. This cabinet has no severity rating: it lists every interaction row our supplement pages cite.

Not medical advice, and no dosing advice. An empty result means no row we cite names that pair, by name or through a drug class we can link the medicine to, not that a combination is safe. Where our sources name only a group of medicines we cannot match, the cabinet says so. Ask your pharmacist before you combine supplements and medicines.

Who should be careful

5 groups
Hormone-sensitive conditions
ERr 731 activates estrogen receptor-beta in cell studies. A records study found no rise in new breast cancer diagnoses, but no trial tested it in women who have had breast, uterine or ovarian cancer or other estrogen-sensitive conditions; they should ask their oncologist or clinician first.97
Allergy
Hypersensitivity was the most common post-marketing report in Germany (74 of 124 adverse event reports).8
Pregnancy and breastfeeding
Trials enrolled only perimenopausal women, and the extract acts on estrogen receptors in cell studies; there are no safety data in pregnancy or breastfeeding, so it has no studied use there. LactMed's rhubarb record covers laxative rhubarb root and has no data on ERr 731; it notes reviewers advise against rhubarb root while breastfeeding because of possible laxative effects in the infant.13911
Not garden rhubarb
The trial extract is made from the root of rhapontic rhubarb; rhubarb stalks eaten as food are a different product.8
Medicines and surgery
No drug interaction studies of ERr 731 were found in our sources, so interaction data are lacking. NCCIH advises telling your health care providers about every supplement you use.10
Talk to your pharmacist or clinician before starting a supplement, especially if you take prescription medicines.

How to read the label

What to check on the Supplement Facts panel.

How to read the label

3 checks
Look for ERr 731

All the trials used the ERr 731 extract at 4 mg a day; a rhubarb root product without that extract name is not the tested product.64

Brand names

ERr 731 is sold as Phytoestrol N in Germany and as Estrovera in North America.8

Not laxative rhubarb root

Rhubarb root sold as a laxative (Rheum officinale, Rheum palmatum) contains anthraquinones, which act as cathartics; ERr 731 is a different extract, from rhapontic rhubarb root.118

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to common questions; the numbers link to the sources below.

Common questions

8 answers
Does ERr 731 help hot flashes?

In two 12-week trials of about 110 perimenopausal women each, one ERr 731 tablet a day lowered menopause symptom scores and the number and severity of hot flushes vs placebo.13

Does ERr 731 raise breast cancer risk?

A German records study of 5,686 users found no higher breast cancer diagnosis rate than in non-users (OR 1.01). It is observational; two authors work for Health Research Services GmbH, whose owner co-authored the ERr 731 trials.7

Does ERr 731 help menopausal anxiety?

In the 109-woman trial, Hamilton Anxiety scores fell from 27.5 to 9.4 vs 25.1 to 21.6 on placebo. This came from the same trial as the symptom results.2

What dose of rhubarb extract was studied?

One enteric-coated 4 mg ERr 731 tablet a day.6

How long does ERr 731 take to work?

In the 12-week trial, the number and severity of hot flushes fell from week 4, and symptom scores kept falling in open follow-up of up to 96 weeks.15

Does ERr 731 interact with medicines?

No interaction studies were found in our sources, so the data are lacking. Because it acts on estrogen receptor-beta in cell studies, people using hormone therapy or with hormone-sensitive conditions should ask their clinician first.910

Is ERr 731 safe during pregnancy or breastfeeding?

There are no data: trials enrolled only perimenopausal women. LactMed's rhubarb record has no information on this extract and notes reviewers advise against laxative rhubarb root while breastfeeding.111

Is it a hormone?

No. It is a plant extract that activated estrogen receptor-beta, not alpha, in cell studies; endometrial biopsies did not differ from placebo over 12 weeks.91

Sources

11 sources: trial abstracts, NIH fact sheets and reference databases. Numbers in the text link here.

Sources cited on this page

11 sources
  1. 1Efficacy and safety of a special extract of Rheum rhaponticum (ERr 731) in perimenopausal women with climacteric complaints: a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.RCT Menopause, 2006 · PMID 16894335
  2. 2The special extract ERr 731 of the roots of Rheum rhaponticum decreases anxiety and improves health state and general well-being in perimenopausal women.RCT Menopause, 2007 · PMID 17213754
  3. 3Confirmation of the efficacy of ERr 731 in perimenopausal women with menopausal symptoms.RCT Altern Ther Health Med, 2009 · PMID 19161045
  4. 4Efficacy evaluation of standardized Rheum rhaponticum root extract (ERr 731 (®)) on symptoms of menopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis study.Meta-analysis J Biomed Res, 2024 · PMID 38646867
  5. 5Long-term efficacy and safety of the special extract ERr 731 of Rheum rhaponticum in perimenopausal women with menopausal symptoms.Open-label trial Menopause, 2009 · PMID 18978638
  6. 6The special extract ERr 731(®) from the root of rhapontic rhubarb (Rheum rhaponticum): efficacy in headache/migraine and further climacteric complaints in women in the perimenopause.RCT Front Pharmacol, 2026 · PMID 42416823
  7. 7Association between Extract Rheum rhaponticum 731 (ERr 731) prescription and subsequent breast cancer.Observational Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2025 · PMID 40358648
  8. 8Rheum rhaponticum Extract (ERr 731): Postmarketing Data on Safety Surveillance and Consumer Complaints.Observational Integr Med (Encinitas), 2016 · PMID 27547165
  9. 9Activation of estrogen receptor-beta by a special extract of Rheum rhaponticum (ERr 731), its aglycones and structurally related compounds.Animal study J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 2007 · PMID 17692514
  10. 10Using Dietary Supplements WiselyFact sheet National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), 2019 · nccih.nih.gov
  11. 11Rhubarb. In: Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®) (revised February 15, 2025)Database National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2025 · ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

What changed

Every dated change to this page: what changed, who made it and why.

Change log

2 entries
Dated changes to this page
DateChangeWho and why
evidence, who should be careful, label guide, FAQSearched PubMed for ERr 731 and Rheum rhaponticum trials through 2026. Added the 2026 report's 52-week open follow-up as a row (PMID 42416823, grade D). Pregnancy and breastfeeding note now cites LactMed (rhubarb record NBK501862), which has no data on ERr 731. No published drug interaction studies were found (PubMed, LactMed), so the interactions list stays empty and the medicines note and a FAQ say so. Label guide extended with brand names and the difference from laxative rhubarb root; three FAQs added.Writer: Kymata Health EditorialTrigger: A–Z page audit
allInitial editorial evidence review. Every PMID checked against NCBI E-utilities esummary (title, year, journal) and each cited abstract read; numbers taken from the abstracts. The 4 mg dose is from the 2026 trial report. The pooled analysis is graded B, not A, because most trials come from one maker-linked group; the anxiety paper is marked as a secondary report of the 2006 trial. Mechanism from cell data only. Where to buy: we didn’t list a product; none of the stores we checked sells ERr 731. Adversarial review 2026-10-17: pregnancy/breastfeeding and estrogen-sensitive-condition rows made explicit (no data; not tested after hormone-sensitive cancer).Writer: Kymata Health EditorialTrigger: new page

Supplement & Nutrient Encyclopedia. Educational information only; it is not medical advice and does not replace a clinician. Dietary supplements are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Statements about supplements have not been evaluated by the FDA.

Educational only. Not medical advice. Some links earn us a commission: kymatahealth.com/affiliate-disclosure.