Red vine leaf extract (Vitis vinifera leaf)

Also called red vine leaf, grapevine leaf, Vitis viniferae folium, AS 195, red vine leaves extract, RVLE.

The short answer

From 8 sources

Red vine leaf extract, best known as AS 195, is a flavonoid-rich water extract of red grapevine leaves. In two placebo-controlled trials of about 250 adults each with chronic venous insufficiency, 360–720 mg a day for 12 weeks reduced lower-leg volume and some symptoms. The newer, manufacturer-funded trial found a smaller effect.

Key facts

What it is
Dry aqueous extract (4–6:1) of red grapevine leaves; main flavonoids quercetin-3-O-glucuronide and isoquercitrin71
EU status
Well-established use for chronic venous insufficiency at 360–720 mg/day, with a 12-week course7
Leg volume
2000 trial: −76 to −100 g lower-leg volume vs placebo; 2011 trial: −19.9 ml12
Funding
The 2011 trial was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim, maker of the AS 195 product2
Tolerability
A 2026 network meta-analysis of 51 RCTs linked red vine leaf extract with fewer adverse events than control (RR 0.62)5

What it is

Red vine leaf extract is a flavonoid-rich water extract of red grapevine leaves, studied for leg swelling in venous insufficiency.

How it works

Proposed

The EU monograph says the extract improves microvascular blood flow in people with chronic venous insufficiency and lists its pharmacokinetics as not known. A 2019 review of non-clinical and clinical data proposes that its active ingredients accumulate in the vein wall and preserve endothelial barrier function.736

Forms, side by side

2 forms named in our sources. The rest show what our data holds, and say plainly where it holds nothing yet.

Red vine leaf extract (Vitis vinifera leaf) forms compared

2 forms
Red vine leaf extract (Vitis vinifera leaf) forms compared: 2 forms by 3 attributes. Empty cells are labelled No data yet, or Not graded in the evidence row.
2 formsAS 195 dry extract (4–6:1, water) tablets or capsulesTraditional grapevine leaf tea, powder or soft extract
Absorption in peopleNo human pharmacokinetic data; the EU monograph lists pharmacokinetics as not known.7No human absorption data.7
GI toleranceTolerability similar to placebo in the 2011 trial; adverse events rare and usually mild in the 2000 trial.21EU monograph lists nausea, gastrointestinal complaints, headache and skin reactions, frequency not known.7
Studied forChronic venous insufficiency (leg volume, symptoms, microcirculation)Traditional use only for heavy legs, haemorrhoid itching and capillary fragility; not tested in the trials above
  1. AS 195 dry extract (4–6:1, water) tablets or capsules
    Absorption in people
    No human pharmacokinetic data; the EU monograph lists pharmacokinetics as not known.7
    GI tolerance
    Tolerability similar to placebo in the 2011 trial; adverse events rare and usually mild in the 2000 trial.21
    Studied for
    Chronic venous insufficiency (leg volume, symptoms, microcirculation)
  2. Traditional grapevine leaf tea, powder or soft extract
    Absorption in people
    No human absorption data.7
    GI tolerance
    EU monograph lists nausea, gastrointestinal complaints, headache and skin reactions, frequency not known.7
    Studied for
    Traditional use only for heavy legs, haemorrhoid itching and capillary fragility; not tested in the trials above
Every cell holds data from a cited page; citation numbers link to the page that holds them.Scroll the table for every column

What the human research says

Human trials only, one row per outcome. The form line shows what each trial actually tested. Grades follow our evidence-grading policy.

Trial map

4 graded outcomes, largest study first

All 4 graded outcomes found an improvement. The largest, a 2000 randomized trial of 257 people on Lower-leg volume and symptoms in chronic venous insufficiency, found an improvement.

Bar: the ages a study enrolled (running to the edge when it states no upper or lower limit). Dot: only a mean age, counted as near your age within 5 years. Tick: the mean age inside a range.

3Skin microcirculation, oxygen supply and leg circumference: improved, 18+

1Lower-leg volume and symptoms in chronic venous insufficiency: improved, 25–75

4Leg symptoms (tired, heavy legs, tension, tingling, pain): improved, 25–82

2Lower-limb volume and leg pain: improved, ages not stated

1Lower-leg volume and symptoms in chronic venous insufficiency

Improved · Grade B · RCT, 257 people, 2000

Outpatients aged 25–75 with stage I to early stage II chronic venous insufficiency, not using compression stockings

Dose, result and source
Every graded outcome on this page, largest study first
OutcomeFoundPeopleStudyWho was studied
Lower-leg volume and symptoms in chronic venous insufficiencyImproved257Grade B · RCT, 2000Outpatients aged 25–75 with stage I to early stage II chronic venous insufficiency, not using compression stockings
Lower-limb volume and leg painImproved248Grade B · RCT, 2011Adults with chronic venous insufficiency (CEAP C3–C4a) and moderate-to-severe symptoms
Skin microcirculation, oxygen supply and leg circumferenceImproved71Grade C · Crossover RCT, 2004Adults with stage I–II chronic venous insufficiency
Leg symptoms (tired, heavy legs, tension, tingling, pain)Improved65Grade D · Open-label trial, 2003Adults aged 25–82 with grade I–II chronic venous insufficiency
Each circle is one graded outcome on this page, numbered from the largest study down, and placed by how many people it studied (log scale). By age shows the ages each study enrolled, where it states them. It shows who was studied and what was found, not advice about your dose.

Every graded row

4 rows

Showing 4 of 4 outcomes. Human trials only.

Grade BLower-leg volume and symptoms in chronic venous insufficiencyChronic venous insufficiencyImprovedRCT
n 257 · 2000

Improved Lower-leg volume fell by 75.9 g (360 mg) and 99.9 g (720 mg) versus placebo; calf circumference and key symptoms also improved more (p<0.001). Adverse events were rare and usually mild.

Design
RCT, n = 257, 2000
Population
Outpatients aged 25–75 with stage I to early stage II chronic venous insufficiency, not using compression stockings
Form
Red vine leaf extract AS 195
Dose
360 mg or 720 mg once daily
Duration
12 weeks
Source
Reference 1 · PubMed 10719612 (opens PubMed)
Grade BLower-limb volume and leg painChronic venous insufficiencyImprovedRCT
n 248 · 2011

Improved Limb volume fell by 19.9 ml more than placebo (p=0.027) and leg pain by 6.6 mm on a 10-cm scale (p=0.047); other symptoms did not change significantly. Tolerability was similar to placebo.

Design
RCT, n = 248, 2011
Population
Adults with chronic venous insufficiency (CEAP C3–C4a) and moderate-to-severe symptoms
Form
Red vine leaf extract AS 195
Dose
720 mg daily
Duration
12 weeks
Source
Reference 2 · PubMed 21239190 (opens PubMed)
Grade CSkin microcirculation, oxygen supply and leg circumferenceChronic venous insufficiencyImprovedCrossover RCT
n 71 · 2004

Improved Microvascular blood flow and transcutaneous oxygen rose versus placebo, and ankle and calf circumference fell (all p<0.0001).

Design
Crossover RCT, n = 71, 2004
Population
Adults with stage I–II chronic venous insufficiency
Form
Red vine leaf extract AS 195
Dose
360 mg once daily
Duration
6 weeks per period
Source
Reference 3 · PubMed 15293865 (opens PubMed)
Grade DLeg symptoms (tired, heavy legs, tension, tingling, pain)Chronic venous insufficiencyImprovedOpen-label trial
n 65 · 2003

Improved All subjective symptoms improved significantly from baseline; 6 people had adverse events possibly related to the extract, 4 of them gastrointestinal.

Design
Open-label trial, n = 65, 2003
Population
Adults aged 25–82 with grade I–II chronic venous insufficiency
Form
AS 195 film-coated tablets
Dose
360 mg once daily
Duration
6 weeks
Source
Reference 4 · PubMed 12785119 (opens PubMed)

What the numbers add up to

Each point is worked out from the data and the sources numbered on this page, with the arithmetic shown under it. It adds no new data and is not medical advice.

Two trials, different sizes of effect

Leg-volume reduction was about 76–100 g in the 2000 trial but about 20 ml in the 2011 trial, which enrolled people with CEAP C3–C4a disease and moderate-to-severe symptoms.12

How we got this: Trial abstracts

Newest pooled finding is about tolerability

Neither the 2020 systematic review of 5 trials nor the 2026 network meta-analysis reported a newer placebo-controlled leg-swelling result than the 2011 trial; the 2026 analysis linked red vine leaf extract only with fewer adverse events than control (RR 0.62).85

How we got this: PubMed search 2012–2026 compared with the trials in the evidence table

Studied doses

Doses used in research, shown against the official limits. They describe the studies, not a recommendation for you.

Studied doses in research, not advice. These are amounts used in research, not personal advice. Your clinician or pharmacist can say what fits you.

Doses studied in human trials

Doses studied in human trials ranged from 360 mg to 720 mg of AS 195 dry extract once daily for 6 to 12 weeks, matching the 360–720 mg daily range and 12-week course in the EU monograph.1237

Interactions and safety

Published interactions only: each row cites a source. No row means none was found in our sources, not that a combination is safe.

Interactions

0 agents

None found in our sources.

Check with what you take

Kept on this device only

Add what you take. We list every interaction our evidence profiles cite between Red vine leaf extract and your picks, and between your picks.

Most cited:

Add a supplement or medicine you take to check it against Red vine leaf extract.

Starting from one medicine? The interaction checker rates how serious each pair is, on a curated list of 19 entries for 11 medicines. This cabinet has no severity rating: it lists every interaction row our supplement pages cite.

Not medical advice, and no dosing advice. An empty result means no row we cite names that pair, by name or through a drug class we can link the medicine to, not that a combination is safe. Where our sources name only a group of medicines we cannot match, the cabinet says so. Ask your pharmacist before you combine supplements and medicines.

Who should be careful

5 groups
Sudden swelling, clots or ulcers
The EU monograph says to see a doctor with skin inflammation, thrombophlebitis, hardened tissue under the skin, severe pain, ulcers, sudden swelling of one or both legs, or heart or kidney insufficiency.7
No improvement in 2 weeks
If swelling does not respond within 2 weeks, the EU monograph advises seeing a doctor because oedema may have other causes.7
Under 18
Not recommended for children and adolescents under 18 because of insufficient safety data.7
Pregnancy and breastfeeding
Safety has not been established, and the EU monograph does not recommend use during pregnancy or lactation.7
Allergy
Contraindicated with hypersensitivity to the extract; itching, redness and urticaria have been reported.7
Talk to your pharmacist or clinician before starting a supplement, especially if you take prescription medicines.

Frequently asked questions

Short answers to common questions; the numbers link to the sources below.

Common questions

5 answers
Does red vine leaf extract reduce leg swelling?

Two placebo-controlled trials of AS 195 found less lower-leg volume after 12 weeks in chronic venous insufficiency: about 76–100 g in 2000 and about 20 ml in 2011. A 2020 systematic review of 5 trials found improvements in only some trials and called for higher-quality studies.128

How long before effects appear?

The trials ran 6 to 12 weeks; the EU monograph describes a 12-week course and says to see a doctor if swelling does not respond within 2 weeks.137

Does it interact with medicines?

The EU monograph lists interactions as not known; formal interaction studies are lacking in our sources.7

Can it be used in pregnancy?

The EU monograph does not recommend it during pregnancy or breastfeeding, or for anyone under 18.7

Is it the same as grape seed extract?

No. AS 195 is a water extract of red grapevine leaves containing flavonoids; the trials here tested the leaf extract only.71

Sources

8 sources: trial abstracts, NIH fact sheets and reference databases. Numbers in the text link here.

Sources cited on this page

8 sources
  1. 1Efficacy of orally administered extract of red vine leaf AS 195 (folia vitis viniferae) in chronic venous insufficiency (stages I-II). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.RCT Arzneimittelforschung, 2000 · PMID 10719612
  2. 2Efficacy and tolerability of a red-vine-leaf extract in patients suffering from chronic venous insufficiency--results of a double-blind placebo-controlled study.RCT Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2011 · PMID 21239190
  3. 3Improvement of cutaneous microcirculation and oxygen supply in patients with chronic venous insufficiency by orally administered extract of red vine leaves AS 195: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.Crossover RCT Drugs R D, 2004 · PMID 15293865
  4. 4Oedema protective properties of the red vine leaf extract AS 195 (Folia vitis viniferae) in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. A 6-week observational clinical trial.Open-label trial Arzneimittelforschung, 2003 · PMID 12785119
  5. 5Pharmacological interventions to treat chronic venous disease: A network meta-analysis.Meta-analysis Phlebology, 2026 · PMID 42529868
  6. 6Therapeutic approach to chronic venous insufficiency - clinical benefits of red-vine-leaf-extract AS 195 (Antistax(®)).Review Pharmazie, 2019 · PMID 30940301
  7. 7European Union herbal monograph on Vitis vinifera L., folium (Revision 1, EMA/HMPC/464684/2016)Guideline European Medicines Agency (HMPC), 2017 · ema.europa.eu
  8. 8Red vine leaf extract (AS 195) can improve some signs and symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency, a systematic review.Systematic review Phytother Res, 2020 · PMID 32314844

What changed

Every dated change to this page: what changed, who made it and why.

Change log

2 entries
Dated changes to this page
DateChangeWho and why
FAQ, insightsPubMed search for 2012–2026 trials and reviews of red vine leaf extract found no newer placebo-controlled trial; added the 2020 systematic review of 5 trials (PMID 32314844) to the FAQ and an insight on the age of the efficacy evidence. Interactions re-checked: the EU monograph lists none known; LactMed has no entry. Fact-checked against the sources; corrected: the insight is reworded to what the two reviews report, without claiming that no newer trial exists.Writer: Kymata Health EditorialTrigger: A–Z page audit
allInitial editorial evidence reviewWriter: Kymata Health EditorialTrigger: new page

Supplement & Nutrient Encyclopedia. Educational information only; it is not medical advice and does not replace a clinician. Dietary supplements are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Statements about supplements have not been evaluated by the FDA.

Educational only. Not medical advice. Some links earn us a commission: kymatahealth.com/affiliate-disclosure.